Independent Investigations Office is imperfect, but better than previous system of looking at police-involved shootings
A police shooting took place outside Starlight Casino in New Westminster on November 8, 2012.
Image from CTV News
The Independent Investigations Office is looking into the
shooting death of 20-year-old Hudson Brooks outside the South Surrey district RCMP
office early in the morning of July 18.
It is the sixth investigation into an officer-involved
shooting that the IIO has instituted since April 1. While police have said that
Brooks was “suicidal,” he apparently was not armed. The shooting has provoked a
wave of anger in South Surrey, and many people say the shooting was an extreme
over-reaction by police.
The IIO has emphasized the importance of getting witness
accounts of what happened on July 18, and particularly wants to hear from
civilians. Anyone with information, or who witnessed the incident, is asked to
contact the IIO’s toll-free witness line at 1-855-446-8477.
Officer-involved deaths are deeply troubling. This shooting
took place just a few days before the lead RCMP officer in the October, 2007 Taser
death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver Airport, Benjamin “Monty” Robinson, was
sentenced to two years less a day for lying to a public inquiry into Dziekanski’s
death. Two other RCMP officers were exonerated, but Robinson, who has since
resigned from the RCMP, joins Const. Kwesi Millington in facing jail time for their
role in what has been deemed a cover-up.
The Dziekanski death at the hands of police, and the subsequent
Braidwood Inquiry into police actions, played a key role in the establishment of
the IIO. It has proven controversial. Police in particular do not like the role
the IIO plays in investigating death and injuries caused by police action.
This isn’t too surprising. Given that police had control of
these investigations before the IIO was established, the significant shift
causes considerable turmoil in each of these investigations. While the most
recent practice prior to establishment of the IIO had been to have other forces investigate, it remained “all in
the (police) family.”
Some current and former police officers are also very angry
at the IIO over the laying of murder charges against Delta Police Const. Jordan
MacWilliams, who was part of an emergency response team that was called to deal
with a distraught man outside the Starlight Casino in New Westminster, in
November, 2012. Mehrdad Bayrami was shot and killed, and following an IIO
investigation, MacWilliams was later charged with murder.
After further investigation, the Criminal Justice Branch of the
ministry of attorney-general announced earlier this month that a stay of proceedings had been entered, saying evidence in the case "no longer
satisfies its charge approval standard for the continued prosecution."
This brings up the question as to why the charges went ahead
in the first place. Some feel the IIO was looking for a scalp to hang from its
belt to justify its existence, and these things do happen in public agencies.
However imperfect the IIO is, the public need to have
confidence in police at all times in order for our system of law and order to function
properly. When other police forces do investigations into police-involved
shootings or other possible crimes, it appears to many people that the
investigators will go soft.
The IIO was designed to show that an outside agency, which
is not in any way beholden to police, can conduct an impartial investigation
into deaths or serious injuries at the hands of police. Its record is decidedly
mixed thus far, and the stay of the murder charges in the MacWillams case does
not lead to any confidence in its initial investigation.
The most important thing here is that the vast majority of
the public have confidence in police, and in law and order in general. There
have been too many questionable cases in recent times in B.C. to leave investigations
of police-involved death or serious injury in the hands of police.
The fact that police (and the IIO) cannot lay charges in B.C.
is another safeguard. That duty is performed by Crown counsel in this province.
While some could argue that the Crown erred in allowing the MacWilliams charge
to proceed at first, there’s something to be said for taking a second look at
the evidence.
It’s far too early to tell what the IIO will come up with in
the Brooks case. It needs to do a thorough job, and it will likely be months
before any results are known. However, having the IIO investigate the matter is
better than what used to take place.
This week's column in the Surrey Leader and Peace Arch News
Comments
Post a Comment