Broken community court promise won't help reduce crime in Surrey
Crime has been the dominant issue in Surrey since well
before the 2014 municipal election, which saw Linda Hepner succeed Dianne Watts
as mayor and the Surrey First slate gain all nine seats on council.
Back in 2007, when Watts was mayor, city council adopted a
crime reduction strategy. One key element was introduction of a community
court, similar to one that has been quite successful in the Downtown Eastside
of Vancouver.
However, Justice Minister Suzanne Anton has now put the brakes
on that idea. At a recent groundbreaking for an expansion of Surrey Provincial Court
– the busiest provincial courthouse in the province – she said “Community court
is off the table.”
The idea for a community court in Surrey followed a trip by
Watts and seven other city representatives to New York. They found that community
courts there addressed the root causes of crime and delivered swift justice.
In such courts, people convicted of relatively minor crimes
resulting from substance abuse are sent directly for treatment, often within a
very short time. Those up for domestic violence charges go to counselling. Thieves
are directed to repay what is stolen.
In Vancouver, a community court has been operating since
2008. A review in 2014 found that there was a significant drop in re-offending by
those who appeared in the court. Anton
said at that time “that is the most important thing a courtroom can do."
If it works well in the Downtown Eastside, often called “the
poorest postal code in Canada,” why is there no interest in putting one in
Surrey? There are many similar social issues in Surrey, particularly substance
abuse and homelessness, although such issues are not as restricted to one area
of the city. Recent actions by the Surrey bylaw department in seizing the belongings
of the homeless and doing what some observers call “cattle prodding” to move
them along seem to indicate that there is an ongoing problem.
Anton said at the sod turning that “Surrey has concluded
there will be a justice hub, which should have a lot of the services” of a
community court. Hepner said she believes the expanded court will fulfil some
of the functions of a community court.
“I’m going to colour it community court, because it's wrap
around relative to mental health, youth and domestic (offences)," Hepner said.
Watts isn’t as convinced. Now a Conservative MP in Ottawa,
she said the promise of a community court was strung along for many years by
various provincial politicians. She still believes it would work well.
“It was a best practice then, it`s a best practice now.”
People who are regularly involved with offenders, particularly
first-time offenders and those hampered by mental illness or substance abuse, have
said repeatedly that dealing with them in the regular court system does not
work. The justice system is filled with delays. Often delays last for years.
Young people, mentally ill people and substance abusers often have no idea what
they are even in court for, by the time their case actually goes to trial.
It is important to have services available to people who are
in court, but the delays that seem to be routine in court will likely minimize
the benefit of any additional services. It needs to be pointed out that the
2014 review of the Vancouver community court said there was little improvement
in courtroom efficiency. Perhaps that is why the city has caved in to pressure
from the provincial government not to bring in a community court, and has been
mollified by promises of additional services.
Gordon Bylo, the Surrey father of a schizophrenic man who
has been in and out of jail for nine years, said his son missed a probation
appointment and was then taken to the Surrey Pre-Trial Centre (a jail) and placed
in segregation for 12 days. How is that improving justice?
The broken promise of a community court for Surrey is not
good news, when it comes to attempts to reduce crime in Surrey.
Comments
Post a Comment