Surrey takes lukewarm position on pipeline twinning, while stating concerns about routing and costs
Kinder Morgan photo
Twinning of the Trans Mountain pipeline will have a profound effect on Surrey, the National Energy Board was told last week.
The City of Surrey stated its position on the proposal to
twin the Trans Mountain pipeline at National Energy Board hearings last week. It
is not in favour or opposed to the pipeline proposal – it simply doesn’t want the
project to cost local taxpayers more money.
In addition, the city has concerns about portions of the proposed
new route. It also would like to see the new pipeline route accommodate both
the twinned pipeline and the original line, thus taking the line built in 1953 through
portions of north Surrey out of commission.
Surrey’s position in many ways dovetails with the general attitude
of many B.C. residents, and the provincial government. The enthusiasm for the
pipeline project is lukewarm at best, and specific benefits are demanded in
return for support.
At the same time, many other B.C. residents, including members
of virtually all environmental organizations and a large number of First
Nations, are completely opposed to the project and will likely never sign on,
no matter what accommodations are made.
Surrey and four other Lower Mainland municipalities say that
construction of the pipeline will lead to $93 million in additional
infrastructure costs over the next 50 years. This is because they will have to adjust
design and construction methods to work around pipelines.
Assistant city solicitor Anthony Capuccinello told the NEB that
proponent Kinder Morgan should shoulder those additional costs – not taxpayers.
This argument is based on the fact that the pipeline is a private, for-profit
business and should pay for any costs which accrue to the public.
The city also called for an adjustment to the route. It does
not want to see it running through the Surrey Bend regional park, but instead
run along Golden Ears Way and Highway 17 to the proposed crossing of the Fraser
River, just east of the Port Mann bridge.
Perhaps the most interesting point made by the city was its
suggestion that the existing pipeline through Surrey be decommissioned, with both
pipelines following the new route. This is a very sensible idea and it’s
surprising that Kinder Morgan didn’t propose this right from the start.
Clearly, there are potential problems when oil pipelines run
through residential neighbourhoods. This was demonstrated in 2007 in Burnaby,
when a contractor doing work on a sewer line ruptured the pipeline. The result was
a massive oil spill, significant damage to 11 properties, temporary evacuation
of more than 250 residents and millions in costs.
In Surrey, the current pipeline runs through the Port Kells
industrial area north of 96 Avenue, and into a residential area of Fraser Heights.
It crosses Highway 1 and runs beneath the highway for a short distance near 156
Street, and then runs north of Guildford along 108 Avenue, before going down
the hill towards the Fraser River between 144 and 140 Streets. It runs adjacent
to many residential properties before entering the CN rail yards, and crossing
the river to Coquitlam.
This pipeline route was through a very rural area when it
was built more than 60 years ago. That’s not the case today.
When it announced its plan to twin the pipeline, Kinder
Morgan stated it wanted to build the new line away from residential neighbourhoods
in the Lower Mainland. Why it did not also propose at that time that it reroute
the old line to the new route is a mystery, because it would most certainly be
easier to operate, maintain and deal with problems if there was one pipeline
route, not two.
The proposal to build the second pipeline is part of a much
bigger national conversation on oil and fossil fuels, their role in the
Canadian economy, the need for export facilities, climate change and other
issues. The NEB itself has come in for a lot of unfavourable scrutiny.
Whether a second pipeline will ever be built is very much up
in the air. In the meantime, Surrey has made it clear what it would like to see
if the new pipeline is built.
Comments
Post a Comment