Trans Mountain oil pipeline twinning still faces many hurdles
Portions of the twinned Trans Mountain pipeline have already been built. Whether the new pipeline will be built in the Lower Mainland of B.C. is still up in the air, largely due to court challenges filed by First Nations.
The B.C. government’s recent approval of the Kinder
Morgan proposal to twin the Trans Mountain oil pipeline doesn’t mean the
pipeline will be built – but it is a significant step forward.
The project now has the approval of the federal government
and the provincial government, and Kinder Morgan has reached many deals with
First Nations along the pipeline route. The existing pipeline crosses many
First Nations reserves, and since it was built in 1953, First Nations have
gained many more rights in relation to proposed resource projects and
developments on traditional lands.
If the project doesn’t go ahead, which is the outcome many
B.C. residents fervently hope for, it will most likely falter over an
unfavourable court decision. Several lawsuits are in the works, and those put
forward by First Nations may have the most likelihood of success. The Tsleil-Waututh
Nation, which has filed a lawsuit, has land in North Vancouver directly across
Burrard Inlet from the Kinder Morgan export terminal in Burnaby. The number of
ships carrying crude oil from the terminal will rise from the current 60 per
year to about 400.
In Surrey, the existing pipeline runs through Port Kells and
Fraser Heights before going beneath Highway 1 and travelling across the Fraser
River from a location west of the Port Mann Bridge. The new pipeline, if built,
will likely run along the CN right of way from Port Kells to Port Mann, and not
travel through residential neighbourhoods.
Surrey opposed the pipeline at National Energy Board
hearings, but is now in negotiations for benefits with Kinder Morgan. It has no
power to stop the project, and any lawsuits it filed would likely fail.
There is no word on what Surrey considers the benefits to
be. However, all municipalities the pipeline runs through will receive
additional property tax revenue. In addition, several Lower Mainland municipalities
have already made deals with the company and will receive additional funds,
mainly for specific projects such as parks and recreation facilities.
Surrey would be wise to consider negotiating with Kinder
Morgan about moving the existing pipeline to the proposed new alignment, taking
it out of residential neighbourhoods. In 2007, the pipeline was ruptured by a
contractor working on a project in a Burnaby neighbourhood near the export
terminal, and 250,000 litres of crude oil damaged numerous homes in the immediate
area. Of that amount, 70,000 litres spilled directly into Burrard Inlet. Total
cost of the cleanup was over $15 million. Kinder Morgan and two other companies
pleaded guilty to charges under the Environmental Management Act and were
fined.
The possibility of such a spill in Surrey is low, but it all
depends on how careful contractors are when working in the area near the pipeline.
Assuming the new pipeline is built along the CN right of way, the chances of
such an occurrence would be much lower if both pipelines were located there.
There would be minimal interface with residential properties.
The new pipeline will also be built along a new alignment in the western portion of Langley, and there too it would make sense to relocate the original pipeline to the new alignment. Currently, it goes through a number of Walnut Grove neighbourhoods. There will never be a better time to move it out of residential areas.
Kwantlen Polytechnic University also made a deal with Kinder
Morgan in 2015, which would have seen the company provide about $300,000 in
scholarships, bursaries and other opportunities for trades and technical
students over 20 years. However, it withdrew from the agreement several months later
after being pressured by students, staff and the Kwantlen First Nation, which
has resolutely opposed the pipeline plan.
The debate over the pipeline will continue intensively
throughout the first part of this year, as it will be a major issue in the
provincial election. The lawsuits will continue long past the election date,
and it will likely be several years before the pipeline is built – if it
proceeds at all.
Update - I took part in a meeting with Environment Minister Mary Polak today (Jan. 24), as part of a lunch conversation she held with Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce members. Asked if she thinks the pipeline will go ahead, in face of all the court challenges, she said the courts will be measuring the process and whether it was proper and fair, and whether there was proper consultation with First Nations and other stakeholders.
"I think Kinder Morgan and Site C (also subject of many lawsuits) will withstand the process," she said.
Update - I took part in a meeting with Environment Minister Mary Polak today (Jan. 24), as part of a lunch conversation she held with Greater Langley Chamber of Commerce members. Asked if she thinks the pipeline will go ahead, in face of all the court challenges, she said the courts will be measuring the process and whether it was proper and fair, and whether there was proper consultation with First Nations and other stakeholders.
"I think Kinder Morgan and Site C (also subject of many lawsuits) will withstand the process," she said.
Comments
Post a Comment