Surrey school construction languishes due to provincial delays
There's more than one way to freeze things in Surrey. In January, 74 Avenue in Clayton was covered with snow. A few months later, demolition contractors took down three homes on the street to prepare the site for the building of a new elementary school. Now it is November - and there is still no funding in place for the school to be built, even though funds for it were promised at about the time of this snowfall.
A rally on Oct. 28 once again highlighted the need for more
school space in Surrey.
This issue has become even more critical this school year,
as a settlement between the B.C. government and the B.C. Teachers Federation
following a lengthy court battle means class sizes are significantly smaller.
Many Surrey schools were already short of space, and now there is significantly
less.
The rally was held at Earl Marriott Secondary and was organized by the Surrey Schools
Coalition, a group encompassing parents, city representatives and the business
community. Karen Tan, president of the Surrey District Parents Advisory Council,
said that $217 million was promised for Surrey schools in January by the former
BC Liberal government, but only one school project has actually been funded
from it so far – 10 months later.
“Write a cheque,” rally attendees demanded of the provincial
government, which has total control of the capital funding for schools.
In my own neighbourhood of Clayton, the school district recently
held an open house for neighbours of a new elementary school proposed for a 74
Avenue site. Those attending were told that, while the district demolished the
homes that once stood on the site last spring, it has yet to receive any funds
to start building the school.
This means that the construction process is nowhere close to
beginning. The district cannot let any contracts – it has no money to do so.
When asked when construction was likely to start, officials
in attendance said it would likely be a year or more from now, and the new
elementary school wouldn’t even be open until 2020 at the earliest.
That would mean that, more than four years after the need
was recognized by the provincial government, a school still wouldn’t be open on
the site. This is despite significant overcrowding at all Clayton-area schools.
The same situation holds true in the Grandview Heights area in South Surrey and
the Panorama Ridge-Sullivan areas, and several other pockets in Surrey.
Those attending the open house also heard that the new NDP
government has yet to release funds for Surrey schools because of issues related to the
transition of power. Given that Education Minister Rob Fleming has visited the
Clayton area to see the overcrowding for himself, and that he recently repeated
an NDP pledge to get rid of portables on Surrey school sites, that seems almost
unbelievable.
The rally was told that delays in school construction
go back at least 30 years. Given that overcrowding at Earl Marriott prompted
longtime trustee Laurae McNally to first run for school board in the early 1980s,
it’s been even longer than that. In fact, there have been overcrowding problems
going back to the 1950s, at a time when many Surrey schools were placed on shifts to
handle the large numbers of students. At that time, students were in much larger
classes than today.
Surrey-Cloverdale MLA Marvin Hunt, who was part of the BC
Liberal government that announced the funding in January and is also a former
Surrey school trustee and councillor, said the problem of overcrowding in
Surrey schools goes back to the Social Credit era – and he’s right. Successive Social
Credit, NDP and BC Liberal governments have all been unable to make significant
progress in helping schools keep pace with rapid growth in Surrey.
Despite political promises and pledges of a change in approach from a new
government, nothing has really changed. Surrey students and teachers continue
to learn and teach in hundreds of portable classrooms, while provincial
politicians dither and make excuses.
The unwillingness to supply Surrey with schools seems to be, at least to me, more of a bureaucratic snub aimed at political 'masters' around the cabinet table. No minister is long enough at one ministry to leave an imprint.
ReplyDelete