A few thoughts to help ease confusion as Surrey citizens prepare to vote
Photo from the Surrey Archives
Voters in Surrey (or those who want to vote) are more than
confused as election day approaches. There are 83 candidates in total in Surrey
– far more than any individual has time to check out.
I’ve been following Surrey politics for more than 50 years,
first taking interest in it as a youngster. I’ve seen many mayors, councillors
and school trustees come and go, and known many of them personally. I worked as
a poll clerk at many elections in the 1970s, and have covered Surrey politics
as a reporter, editor, columnist and, more recently, blogger since the 1978
election (when Bob Bose first won election as a councillor).
In my opinion, this current election is one of the most
crucial ones in decades. Those who choose to vote will decide whether the city
will be an open institution, one that takes public input and commentary
seriously, or whether it continues the trend towards tight control of
information and opinions.
The debate over LRT and SkyTrain demonstrates this worrisome
trend. LRT was first proposed a decade ago, and the city has invested millions
towards implementing that system since then. Yet there has been nothing other
than token consultation, and the amount of money now proposed to build the
first (between Guildford and Newton) of what Surrey First mayoral candidate Tom Gill says will be many LRT
lines is staggering – close to $2 billion.
This LRT system will be on the streets, interfacing with
traffic on two very busy roads, and will be forced to shut down anytime there is
a major road closure on 104 Avenue or King George Boulevard. Portions of 104
Avenue will be reduced to one lane each way. This is progress?
Incredibly, Surrey First, which has controlled every seat on
council since 2011, when its developer-funded campaign forced Bose out of
office (he had been the lone voice of dissent for the previous five years),
still defends this as a wise use of taxpayers’ money.
The LRT project also led directly to the widespread
controversy over Hawthorne Park. A road was built through this park, just off
104 Avenue, over the objections of not only nearby residents, but many people
throughout the city. Parkland is scarce in this fast-growing city and deserves
the utmost protection. Hawthorne Park in particular is used by many people who have moved
to Surrey from other countries, don’t have cars, and are less well-served by
city services.
All this meant nothing to Mayor Linda Hepner and her eight
councillors, who refused to acknowledge any of the concerns raised. The matter
went to an alternate approval process (a process which almost never
works in a large city, because of the huge number of signatures required to get
it to referendum stage). The city designed it so that signatures had to be
obtained in August, likely the toughest time of year to do so. This cumbersome and designed-to-fail consultation process
only kicked in because the city had failed to do its legal homework.
Other major issues which have been raised in this campaign
are allegations of voter fraud; policing; crime (in particular, unsolved murders and gangland shootings); lack of school space; tree and green
space preservation; planning; supportive housing; unbridled growth and
unaffordability of housing in general.
I was privileged to help moderate a meeting for the eight
mayoral candidates on Wednesday, Oct. 3, sponsored by the South Surrey-White
Rock Chamber of Commerce and Fraser Valley Real Estate Board.. Seeing them up
close and hearing them speak on a number of issues was very helpful to me and
the 200 or so voters in the room.
The three front-runners are Gill, former mayor Doug McCallum
of Safe Surrey Coalition and former Surrey First member and Integrity Now
candidate Bruce Hayne. Gill and Hayne are sitting councillors. Pauline Greaves
of Proudly Surrey is the other candidate whom I believe has a chance, although
the size of the city and diversity of the electorate makes any prediction
somewhat chancy.
Other candidates are Rajesh Jayaprakash of People First
Surrey; Imtiaz Popat of Progressive Sustainable Surrey; and independents
Francois Nantel and John Wolanski.
CBC held a mayors’ debate on Tuesday, Oct. 9 in Newton. It
only invited Hayne, Gill and McCallum, an interesting choice, given that all
three are right-leaning in a city which has five federal Liberal MPs and where
six of nine MLAs are NDP members. The debate has been criticized for its
exclusionary nature and for letting questions and comments from campaign
workers be used.
Numerous other meetings have been held and the wear and tear
is taking its toll on the candidates. Gill refused to answer a question on
crime and policing at a meeting sponsored by the Surrey Board of Trade Wednesday,
later citing a low blood sugar level as the reason.
Here is a summary of the mayoral candidates’ stances on
policing and rapid transit, culled from their answers at the Oct. 3 meeting.
Policing: McCallum will serve notice that Surrey wants out
of RCMP policing at the first council meeting, and will set up its own police
force. Gill will set up a police board. Jayaprakash says the whole debate is
just a “distraction.” Popat says Surrey “needs to do something different.” Wolanski
called for a Metro police force. Hayne said any move to withdraw from the RCMP
will take at least five to six years to come to fruition. Greaves wants a
regional force, consisting of police in the South Fraser area, notably Delta,
Langley and Surrey.
Rapid transit: Jayaprakash says LRT will cause congestion,
and there needs to be an immediate expansion of the bus fleet. SkyTrain
technology should be used in any expansion. Popat says restoration of service
on the interurban rail line through Surrey is the best way to provide rapid
transit expansion. Wolanski says the phase 1 LRT should go ahead, as it is
fully funded. He added that the line down Fraser Highway to Langley should use
SkyTrain technology.
On rapid transit, Hayne pointed out that decisions are made
by the mayors’ council and TransLink, not any particular mayor or council in
Surrey. He acknowledges that people “don’t want at-grade rapid transit in
Surrey” and is “calling for a pause.” He said any rapid transit should be
either above or below grade. McCallum pointed out that SkyTrain is used
everywhere else in the Lower Mainland, even on lines such as the Canada and Evergreen Lines. Both of those lines (on different alignments) had been proposed as LRT lines at first. He says he will convince Ottawa and Victoria to
shift their funding to build SkyTrain down Fraser Highway, which he says should
be the first priority. Greaves says Surrey should pull out of TransLink and
help set up a new South Fraser Transportation Authority. She says Vancouver
politicians should not be making decisions about what transit technology to use
in Surrey. She also believes the issue of LRT or SkyTrain should go to a referendum.
Gill said "We have $1.65 billion on the table. We don’t have
$2.9 to $3 billion to build SkyTrain." He said there will eventually be 150
kilometres of LRT lines throughout Surrey. “Let’s not lose that money,” he
said. Nantel said LRT will cost $157 million per kilometre to build “or
$157,000 per metre.”
Some thoughts on councillors
On the 48 councillor candidates, it is impossible to know where they stand on most issues. Voters who want to find out more should contact as many as they wish to, directly, via social media or telephone. If they don’t respond, you have your answer.
Here`s a few thoughts on the election of councillors. First,
voters do not have to vote for eight candidates. Your votes will be counted if
you vote for up to eight. In fact, a vote for one or two candidates is far more
powerful than if you vote for eight, as one or the other of your less-favoured
candidates might end up edging out one of your most-favoured.
Councillors should be elected in wards. It would be much
easier to choose one to vote for, and they could actually campaign in
neighbourhoods and meet voters. It would also reduce the tendency to vote for
slates – at the very least slates would become less powerful. Surrey could
easily be split into eight wards, so we would not need additional councillors. Surrey
had a ward system until 1957, with seven councillors elected in wards in its
latter years. At that time, Surrey was home to about 35,000 people.
The new council should press for a ward system. It is even
more important now, with new campaign finance restrictions.
The new council also needs to be made up of people from
various slates and/or independents. That will ensure that there is vigorous
discussion of issues. No more will the mayor be able to tell councillors to be
quiet in council meetings. Ideally, the new council will also reflect the
makeup of the city’s population.
Surrey First and Safe Surrey Coalition are each running full
slates, with eight candidates for councillor. Four candidates are incumbents,
two from Surrey First and two who have left that slate to join Hayne at
Integrity Now. That means there will be a minimum of four new councillors on
the next council.
Here’s some comments on individual candidates, based on what
I know about them from personal contact or media reports. If any of these
people (or others) pique interest from potential voters, I strongly suggest
doing additional research and talking to them individually.
Incumbents: Dave Woods (Integrity Now) – longtime Surrey
RCMP officer and head of Cloverdale community policing office. He was one of
the few Surrey First candidates to speak up at council meetings. He left Surrey
First over Gill’s call for a complete ban on handguns, pointing out that it was
a federal issue and law-abiding handgun owners have nothing to do with gun
crime. He also said that Gill’s lack of consultation with other Surrey First
members, when he made that statement, was consistent with Hepner’s style of
leadership.
Mike Starchuk (Surrey First) – He’s been a defender of
farmers and farmland. Former Surrey fire department member. I met him a few
weeks ago and found him personable. Like other Surrey First councillors, almost
always voted as part of the bloc.
Vera LeFranc (Surrey First) – Also part of the voting bloc.
I was disappointed she did not speak up for concerns over Hawthorne Park, as
she lives in the neighbourhood. A longtime advocate for the homeless she played
a big role in helping get homeless people from the 135A Street tent city into
modular housing.
Barbara Steele (Integrity Now) – She left Surrey First when
Hayne announced he was running for mayor, and joined his slate. She and Gill
are the longest-serving members of council. Ironically both were first elected
as part of McCallum’s Surrey Electors Team. She has not had a high profile in
the city, despite her many years as a councillor.
Newcomers: Brenda Locke (Safe Surrey Coalition) – A one-term
BC Liberal MLA for Surrey-Green Timbers from 2001-2005. She was an effective
MLA, and ran twice for the federal Liberals in Fleetwood-Port Kells. I’ve known
her for years. She is a hard worker and very good at getting public input. I
can’t see her as being the “silent” type on council, should she be elected.
Roslyn Cassells (Greenvote) – A former Vancouver parks
commissioner and first elected Green Party candidate in Canada. She was often
out in left field on a number of issues, and struck me (way back then) as being
more publicity-conscious than public service-oriented. I admit it - I'm reflexively suspicious of Vancouver civic politicians, although I know there have been many good ones over the years.
Doug Elford (Safe Surrey Coalition). – A longtime Newton
resident and community activist who has been very active in pushing for better
policing in Newton and the rest of Surrey. He was president of Surrey Community
Alliance, which had announced a slate of candidates (he was one of them), but
he threw in the towel in August to join the McCallum-led slate. This led to the
demise of SCA. Some of its candidates are running with the Independent Surrey
Voters Association. The original Surrey Voters Association and its NDP-backed opponent,
FAST (For All Surrey Team), were Surrey’s first successful slates back in the
early 1970s.
Narima Dela Cruz (Surrey First) – I don’t know much about
her, but she is part of the slate that backs LRT. Her son Daryl founded
SkyTrain for Surrey, which until recently was a voice in the wilderness calling
for SkyTrain instead of LRT. His group also successfully lobbied to have the
555 bus, which goes from Langley to Lougheed station, stop in Surrey, at the
156 Street exit on Highway 1 which was specifically set up for transit and car
pools. The two Dela Cruz’s obviously disagree on transit.
John Gibeau (Integrity Now) – He is founder and president of
the Honeybee Centre at Fry’s Corner, which keeps some of its bees on vacant
land across from my home. Former president of the Cloverdale Chamber of
Commerce. He has been very involved in the agricultural and Cloverdale communities
and is a tireless activist for bees, which are critical to food production and
to our survival.
Laurie Guerra (Safe Surrey Coalition) – She was a candidate for
the Conservative nomination in Fleetwood-Port Kells for the 2019 federal
election. The nomination was won by Shinder Purewal. She is the former president
of Autism BC, and ran in 2014 with the Safe Surrey slate headed by McCallum.
Paul Hillsdon (Surrey First) – An activist for transit for
many years and former candidate for school board and council. He first ran in
2008 for council, at the age of 18. He has run a blog dealing with urban and transportation
issues. He now works for TransLink on the South of Fraser rapid transit project.
I’m not sure whether that is a conflict of interest or not, but his pay is
coming from taxpayers for work on the LRT project.
Jack Hundial (Safe Surrey Coalition) – A longtime former
Surrey RCMP officer.
Felix Kongyuy (Proudly Surrey) – I know Felix personally and
have had several very good chats with him. He lives in the Green Timbers area
and is originally from Cameroon. He has lots of good ideas and would certainly
bring the perspective of an African immigrant (of whom there are many in
Surrey) to council.
Nasima Nastoh (independent) – She is the mother of Hamed
Nastoh, who committed suicide in 2000 at the age of 14 after relentless bullying.
She is an anti-bullying advocate and is a passionate advocate for victims of
bullying. She is concerned about the impact bullying has on society.
Stuart Parker (Proudly Surrey) – He is former leader of the
BC Green Party, and more recently was involved with the NDP. I’m not sure if he
is still an NDP member. I met him for the first time when we were on a panel together
in late September. He is very well-educated and knowledgeable about urban
issues, and struck me as one who would not be afraid to ask questions should he
be elected. He has appeared in the media a lot during this campaign, as many
non-Surrey reporters know him from the provincial scene.
Steven Pettigrew (Safe Surrey Coalition) - He was the leader
of the community group that came together to fight the destruction of Hawthorne
Park. I have met him and talked to him over the phone, and find him articulate and
passionate. He certainly did not back down when the Surrey First council refused
to acknowledge the very legitimate concerns about building a road through a popular
and well-used park. He has continued to be active in highlighting other green
space areas that developers or the city are planning to clear-cut.
Becky Zhou (independent) – She is the widow of Cloverdale
realtor Colin Hill, who was murdered in 2015 by a 22-year-old after his home
was broken into. She is speaking out about victims’ rights, crime and violence.
As a realtor, she also has ideas about making housing more available and affordable.
The other candidates are: Linda Annis, Trevor Halford, Upkar
Tatlay and Raminder Thomas (Surrey First); Saira Aujla, Bernie Sheppard, Asad
Syed and Derek Zabel (Independent Surrey Voters Association); Avi Dhjaliwal and
Rina Gill (Integrity Now); Maria Foster, Murali Krishnan, Rajan Thampy, Paul
Rusan and Yanni Yu (People First Surrey); Parshotam Goel and Adam MacGillivray
(Proudly Surrey); Mandeep Nagra, Allison Patton and Bableen Rana (Safe Surrey
Coalition); Deanna Welters (Progressive Sustainable Surrey) and independents
Neera Agnihotri, Kashmir Besla, Tanvir Bhupal, Brian Calderwood, Neneng
Galanto, Afshan Kamran, Nicholas Loberg, Kuldip Pelia, Major Singh Rasode and
Forrest Smith.
I will do a separate blog post on issues facing the Surrey
Board of Education and the 29 candidates seeking the seven seats on the board.
Comments
Post a Comment